Court of Justice of the European Union/Sweden: Purchase

ECJ Judgement: Skatteverket v David Hedqvist (bitcoin & VAT exemption)

ECJ Judgement: Skatteverket v David Hedqvist (bitcoin & VAT exemption) submitted by lukav1a to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

ECJ Judgement: Skatteverket v David Hedqvist (bitcoin & VAT exemption)

ECJ Judgement: Skatteverket v David Hedqvist (bitcoin & VAT exemption) submitted by BitcoinAllBot to BitcoinAll [link] [comments]

David Hedqvist från bitcoin.se behöver donationer för rättshjälp angående ett EU-domstolsfall om att bitcoin skall vara momsbefriat. Kan få konsekvenser över hela EU

David Hedqvist från bitcoin.se behöver donationer för rättshjälp angående ett EU-domstolsfall om att bitcoin skall vara momsbefriat. Kan få konsekvenser över hela EU submitted by Cocosoft to sweden [link] [comments]

David Hedqvist från bitcoin.se behöver donationer för rättshjälp angående ett EU-domstolsfall om att bitcoin skall vara momsbefriat. Kan få konsekvenser över hela EU

David Hedqvist från bitcoin.se behöver donationer för rättshjälp angående ett EU-domstolsfall om att bitcoin skall vara momsbefriat. Kan få konsekvenser över hela EU submitted by Cocosoft to BitcoinSWE [link] [comments]

My Crypto taxes in Germany - 2017(18), actual status

Ola ppl,
yesterday I finally had my "date" with my official tax accountant from a major German tax union in Hessen. He does all my official tax work and is legally responsible for my tax return. Since I had some trades in 2017 with BTC, (and a lot in this year!), I was looking forward to this meeting to get all my crypto-tax questions cleared.
The state is as follows:
The German Finanzamt doesn't know how to tax crypto, again. There was a EU judgement (case „Hedqvist“, C-264/14) in 2015 which defines Bitcoin and Crypto as currency and therefore can’t be taxed. This view has also been strengthened by the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) in this year (2018) which has the same view on Crypto. This resulted in the "mess" that we are in (for us in Crypto in Germany it is great actually) tax regarding.
To sum it up, this was told to me from my Tax-man, for a private person doing private trades:
  1. I dont need to report anything Crypto related. Not my BTC buys, not my binance trades, no airdrops, no mining, no passive income from holding, nothing.
  2. The German Finanzamt simply doesnt care for cryptos now, the volume and tax amounts are insignificant and it is now defined as currency-type again. If you are not dealing with SIGNIFICANT amounts of €-value in Cryptos, nobody will even ask you about anything. If you are dealing whit amounts which raises the questions of the "Finanzamt" (hence "Significant"), it is about money laundering and the likes of.
  3. The "Finanzamt" has, for now, no LEGAL way of requesting/tracking trades on crypto-exchanges (except for cases when they go to court), since exchanges are not official banks/financial institutions, they have no legal authority over them. In turn, Crypto exchanges have no official/standardized way of reporting taxable trades/buys/etc... like financial institutions have. No one is going to manually track and calculate your trades unless they are said to do it by court (again, example money laundering and such cases)
  4. I can and should keep a record of my trades IF the legal situation changes. It is highly unlikely, but you never know.
  5. I should never invest more than I can afford, and don’t put everything in Crypto
Cheers
tl;dr: For now, in Germany are NO TAXES to pay on anything crypto related. Cryptos are defined similar to currency and not taxed.
EDIT: I see this is blowing up, I will try to directly talk to the "Finanzamt" about this since the opinions and experiences range from: " You are fucked and going to jail" to "Great, thats it".
EDIT 2: German "Finanzamt" doesnt give statments regarding procedures, I shall contact a legal tax adviser or preferably a union. You cant make that shit up. Back to square 1, will make a second meeting with a different adviser to check it explicitly on that matter. What a legal swamp....
submitted by dmx442 to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

Cryptocurrencies are equal to legal tender. In Germany by law.

Cryptocurrencies are equal (treated under certain circumstances) to legal tender. This is Statement of the German government in a new 27.02.2018 VAT law. I think this could bee the way how G20 will discuss cryptos for whole EU. FOMO.
Linked to the PDF on Minster of Finance site (in German) with original text:
http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Downloads/BMF_Schreiben/Steuerarten/UmsatzsteueUmsatzsteuer-Anwendungserlass/2018-02-27-umsatzsteuerliche-behandlung-von-bitcoin-und-anderen-sog-virtuellen-waehrungen.html
Summary taken from. https://twitter.com/Hofbraeuestatus/969135461452132352?s=19:
Edit: the part about legal tender is wording in the legal text... Of course it doesn't mean you can go to the next supermarket and force them to be paid with Bitcoin. For Crypto as an investment you have to pay taxes.
Sorry for my hype, but I think it is great news anyway.
Read more about this in comment by phobos0815
This is the original text from the legal text.
„(3a) 1 Sog. virtuelle Währungen (Kryptowährungen, z.B. Bitcoin) werden den gesetzlichen Zahlungsmitteln gleichgestellt, soweit diese sog. virtuellen Währungen von den an der Transaktion Beteiligten als alternatives vertragliches und unmittelbares Zahlungsmittel akzeptiert worden sind und keinem anderen Zweck als der Verwendung als Zahlungsmittel dienen (vgl. EuGH-Urteil vom 22. Oktober 2015, C-264/14, Hedqvist, BStBl 2018 II S. xxx). 2 Dies gilt nicht für virtuelles Spielgeld (sog. Spielwährungen oder Ingame-Währungen, insbesondere in Onlinespielen).“
submitted by Noyzone to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

To be clear: An unfavorable ruling by the European Court of Justice regarding VAT and Bitcoin would make accepting Bitcoins for merchants in the EU around 20 % more expensive than other payment solutions.

Scenario: Carlos, a customer, buys a pizza from Mark, the merchant, and pays in Bitcoin.
First of all: The question is not, whether VAT applies to the pizza. That will definitely be the case. If I'm buying a laptop in, let's say, Germany for 1190 EUR, then 190 EUR of that (VAT in Germany is 19 %) goes to the tax man, regardless of whether I pay with euros, bitcoins or gold.
The question is, what happens to the bitcoins afterwards. The merchant now has bitcoins and will want to get rid of them at some point. Either to exchange for euros or to buy a product or service. So he is again selling a "product" (this time bitcoin, considered a commodity under current German tax law, as far as my reading of the law goes). If the product is not ruled VAT-exempt, he will have to pay another 19 % (or whatever the rate in his country is) at that point.
That's the issue.
Another question is, whether that also applies, if the merchant uses BitPay. In the worst case, BitPay could be considered as just an agent acting in the name of the merchant (their terms of use suggest something like that), thereby still putting the merchant in a position, where he - from a tax perspective - has briefly owned bitcoins and then sold them again.
In my opinion, this tax question is super critical and needs to be the top discussion right now. The Bitcoin Foundation and other Bitcoin associations (Bundesverband Bitcoin e.V. in Germany) need to closely follow the case C-264/14 Skatteverket v David Hedqvist where the European Court of Justice will decide about just that. And we need to provide resources to bring about a sensible ruling.
See http://www.bitcoin.se/2014/08/21/i-need-your-help-funding-legal-costs-in-a-case-at-the-eu-court-of-justice-related-to-bitcoin-and-vat-exemption/ and consider donating!
Edit: I should have added the disclaimer, that I'm not a lawyer and this is just my personal interpretation, which very well might be wrong. I have however been following this topic for a while, talked to various parties and read some of the laws involved.
Edit 2: Alright, a little intermediate summary of the discussion below: I'm probably mistaken about the details of case C-264/14 as rtuck99 pointed out. It seems that case will only deal with the question of whether bitcoin exchange fees are VAT-exempt. In my opinion my larger point still stands though, that the ECJ will likely decide about VAT on the bitcoins themselves at some point. Compare the UK guidelines on Bitcoin and VAT with this statement by the German Federal Ministry of Finance (in German, alternatively see this press release by Bundesverband Bitcoin e.V. in English). These two guidelines are - in my opinion - incompatible with each other. Something that ultimately the ECJ will have to resolve. Maybe that will not happen as part of case C-264/14 (but it might, as it's somewhat related, so it still seems risky to me, to let David Hedqvist fight that on his own), but it will happen eventually and we need to have our side presented well then.
Edit 3: David Hedqvist commented below that the case might indeed deal with the issue in a broader sense.
submitted by jav_rddt to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

"David meets Goliath in the Battle for Bitcoin" — front page of dn.se (DN is Sweden's biggest morning paper). EU verdict on btc VAT later today...

submitted by o-o- to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

[uncensored-r/CryptoCurrency] Cryptocurrencies are equal to legal tender. In Germany by law.

The following post by Noyzone is being replicated because some comments within the post(but not the post itself) have been openly removed.
The original post can be found(in censored form) at this link:
np.reddit.com/ CryptoCurrency/comments/8145qm
The original post's content was as follows:
Cryptocurrencies are equal (treated under certain circumstances) to legal tender. This is Statement of the German government in a new 27.02.2018 VAT law. I think this could bee the way how G20 will discuss cryptos for whole EU. FOMO.
Linked to the PDF on Minster of Finance site (in German) with original text:
http://www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/Content/DE/Downloads/BMF_Schreiben/Steuerarten/UmsatzsteueUmsatzsteuer-Anwendungserlass/2018-02-27-umsatzsteuerliche-behandlung-von-bitcoin-und-anderen-sog-virtuellen-waehrungen.html
Summary taken from. https://twitter.com/Hofbraeuestatus/969135461452132352?s=19:
  • Converting crypto to fiat is VAT free
  • Mining is VAT free
  • in game currencies are not equal to fiat
  • exchanges are not always VAT free
  • Cryptocurrencies are equal to fiat if they are used as payment and both sides agreed.
Edit: the part about legal tender is wording in the legal text... Of course it doesn't mean you can go to the next supermarket and force them to be paid with Bitcoin. For Crypto as an investment you have to pay taxes.
Sorry for my hype, but I think it is great news anyway.
Read more about this in comment by phobos0815
This is the original text from the legal text.
„(3a) 1 Sog. virtuelle Währungen (Kryptowährungen, z.B. Bitcoin) werden den gesetzlichen Zahlungsmitteln gleichgestellt, soweit diese sog. virtuellen Währungen von den an der Transaktion Beteiligten als alternatives vertragliches und unmittelbares Zahlungsmittel akzeptiert worden sind und keinem anderen Zweck als der Verwendung als Zahlungsmittel dienen (vgl. EuGH-Urteil vom 22. Oktober 2015, C-264/14, Hedqvist, BStBl 2018 II S. xxx). 2 Dies gilt nicht für virtuelles Spielgeld (sog. Spielwährungen oder Ingame-Währungen, insbesondere in Onlinespielen).“
submitted by censorship_notifier to noncensored_bitcoin [link] [comments]

[GIVE]Cash - Donuts - Old Items

Want free stuff? Read this first:
First of all Credit for the rules goes to daveisnotafk
  1. Post a request in this thread; Your request be in this format (NO EXCEPTIONS):
  2. How many DONUTS do you have?
  3. What LEVEL are you (must NOT be in tutorial, or i'll skip you)?
  4. Pick ONE: Donuts (5,000), Cash ($2 million), ONE Old Item (specify what item you want), or RANDOM (determined by giver)!!
  5. Explain briefly why you want what you requested. (Sorry, but this cuts down on repeat offenders)
  6. ** If you are caught LYING about your donut count, you will be BANNED from my future give threads. The point of posting your donut count is to help us prioritize who gets it first. This doesn't mean you won't get anything.**
After you had posted your request, send me a PRIVATE MESSAGE containing:
UPVOTE and THANK. - Seriously, it's just being polite. Upvotes encourage me to keep giving. Upvotes stop, morale goes down, givers go away. It's free.
I will NEVER ask for anything in return. If anyone claims to be "hedqvist" I only have ONE reddit account. This one. Don't fall for imposters. I do not ask for money, bitcoins, or even reddit gold.
  1. Make your requests reasonable. "Max donuts" isn't something I do, or "every old item" as it takes time away from others I could be helping. Follow the rules ok?
  2. I love upvotes. It puts me in a good mood. The happier I am, the more generous I get haha (I work faster).
  3. LASTLY: this is intended to help people. If I see that you already have more than 2000 donuts.. I get the feeling you've already gotten help. Please don't take advantage of this, it only takes a few people to ruin it for everyone. When you get your items, please, please, please post feedback in here so others know that this works.
Cheers!
Once again credit for the rules goes to daveisnotafk
edit: 17:15 GMT+1
I will be taking a break now i might come back later tonight!
submitted by hedqvist to freedonuts [link] [comments]

Portuguese Tax Authority Issues Ruling on ICO and VAT: Expert Take

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, so you should conduct your own research when making a decision. This text should not be considered as legal or investment advice.
Transactions involving cryptocurrencies are raising interesting questions and concerns in the field of taxation. The supply of electronic goods and services has implications in the field of consumption taxation, which has been harmonized in the European Union through the implementation of the value added taxation (VAT) system. Following a recent tax ruling issued by the Portuguese Tax Authority (PTA), this article discusses VAT-related implications of cryptocurrencies, tokens, and initial coin offerings (ICO).
https://preview.redd.it/b4mubbseo8111.jpg?width=725&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=a9d7e8fcf88ac8bda1f965fd802599d6f35f5709
On the nature of tokens and VAT system
Tokens have an essential role in initial coin offerings, where tokens may be used as a medium of exchange with a function similar to a fiduciary currency, e.g. Bitcoin (currency or value tokens). However, tokens can also be used in several other contexts and leverage functionalities enabled by smart contracts. Thus, they may embody various functions and characteristics depending on the specific circumstances in question. For instance, tokens can be used as smart contracts related to financial instruments and securities, including stock, loans, and derivatives (securities and equity tokens), they can provide access to a product or a service, or permit the contribution and participation in a certain job (usage or work tokens; utility tokens), and may correspond to an underlying physical asset such as gold or real estate (asset tokens).
According to VAT regulations, VAT applicability, liability, and exemption from VAT all depend on the nature of the goods or the services subject to supply as well as certain other circumstances, e.g. the parties of the transaction. As tokens can be used for several purposes, VAT implications of a single token may vary based on its characteristics, functionalities, and final use. Furthermore, VAT implications of virtual products as electronic goods and services are still somewhat unestablished, leaving room for interpretation. Following this legal uncertainty, the PTA recently issued a binding tax ruling (only in Portuguese) addressing the VAT liability of a token in the context of an initial coin offering.
Tax ruling by the Portuguese Tax Authority
The tax ruling request arose from an ICO and the token in question, which had been built on top of Ethereum, was described to be similar to Bitcoin. However, the scarce information provided indicates that it actually seemed to resemble a utility/usage token. The essential question brought up in the request was whether VAT exemption could be granted to the token by applying the exemption foreseen for transactions concerning currency, banknotes, and coins used as legal tender. Other matters to be discussed concerned the rendering of services through an electronic platform in the light of VAT purposes as well as the registration on the Mini One Stop Shop (“MOSS”).
The PTA concluded that, in principle, transactions containing a token may be considered an onerous transfer of goods and, thus, prima facie liable to VAT. Notwithstanding, the Tax Authority confirmed that the transfer of tokens may be exempt from VAT under the exemption foreseen for transactions concerning currency, banknotes, and coins used as legal tender. Furthermore, it was established that the VAT exemption only applies if the transfer of tokens consists merely in an alternative form of payment. In other words, attention needs to be paid to the characteristics and functions of the token in question, which typically requires a case-by-case analysis. Lastly, the PTA considered that the VAT exemption may also apply in other EU Member States since VAT is a harmonized system.
The view adopted by the PTA is in line with the previous decision issued by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) on the Hedqvist case (C-264/14), where the ECJ established that the exchange of traditional currency for Bitcoins and vice versa constituted the supply of services under the VAT directive. However, the supply of services in question was regarded as exempt from VAT under the exemption concerning legal tender. It is to be noted that the ECJ also founded its conclusion on the common factual ground (in the specific circumstances of that case) according to which “the ’bitcoin’ virtual currency has no other purpose than to be a means of payment,” which is also indicative of a need for a case-by-case analysis, namely with close attention to each token’s functions and characteristics.
With regard to the supply of electronic services, the PTA stated that, pursuant to the Portuguese VAT Code, the electronic rendering of services is taxable in the state of the acquirer, whether the latter is a consumer (B2C) or a company (B2B), and regardless of the state of the supplier. Consequently, the supplier must assess the VAT even if the acquirer is a resident in another state. Apart from the possibility to register in each state where the supplier renders electronic services, the supplier may also register at MOSS, which enables all VAT obligations to be complied with in one EU Member State.
Other tax aspects: Income tax exemption on the sale of cryptocurrencies
In addition to the VAT-related implications discussed above, cryptocurrencies have raised other tax-related questions in Portugal. The PTA has already deliberated on income taxation of the sale and purchase of cryptocurrencies in a previous tax ruling (only in Portuguese). According to this ruling, also touched upon at Cointelegraph, the Portuguese personal income taxation regime did not apply to the income derived from the sale of cryptocurrency, as no income category covers cryptocurrency gains, provided that the sale is not performed in the context of a business activity. Thus, there was no legal basis in Portugal for income taxation of cryptocurrency gains in those circumstances. However, as opposed to consumption taxation, income taxation is not harmonized at the European Union level. Consequently, the views adopted by the PTA regarding income taxation and cryptocurrencies have primarily only a domestic impact.
Source

#Cryptocurrency #ICO #Blockchain #TokenSale #daico #w12 #Token #AI #coin #bonus #platform #bitcoin #ethereum #crypto #currencies #project #marketplace #cryptotrading #icoinvest #iconews #technology #platformmarket #PTA #VAT #tax #Portuguese

submitted by W12io to u/W12io [link] [comments]

I need your help funding legal costs in a case at the EU Court of Justice related to Bitcoin and VAT exemption!

As some of you may already know there is an ongoing case regarding Bitcoin and VAT exemption in Sweden and the EU. The Supreme Administrative Court (“Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen”) has now requested a preliminary ruling from the EU Court of Justice. The case, C-264/14, can be found here and has been covered quite a lot in media (Bloomberg, Law360, CoinDesk).
I got involved in this simply by asking for an advance ruling in Sweden because I wanted to start selling bitcoin on my site bitcoin.se. It has now escalated and I find myself in a situation where my case will likely decide if and how VAT should be applied to Bitcoin throughout the EU.
It took me a while to realize the significance of this case and I have to appoint a top law firm team here in Sweden that can prepare a written submission (and we’re short on time here - this has to be done in 3 weeks) as well as a potential oral hearing later on. The Swedish counsel will also cooperate with interested parties throughout Europe to get input and support from other European countries if deemed necessary. I am currently discussing with teams at three of Swedens top firms in VAT and EU-law. After asking about the costs I have received fee estimates that range from 22 000 to 38 000 EUR (approximately 56 to 96 bitcoin at the time of writing).
So here is my problem. There is no way that I can finance this personally. I don’t have enough commercial interest in the case to throw all of my savings on it, the business that we wanted to start on bitcoin.se has not been launched so there is no money there. This is why I am now reaching out to the Bitcoin community.
Disclaimer: Donating is in no way a guarantee that we will win the case but if I can’t raise the money the risks are dramatically increased that I will lose since I will have to deal with the court proceedings on my own (which one of the parties I have discussed the case with has described as “catastrophical” for Bitcoin in Europe).
If the donated money is in excess of the costs I will donate the excess funds to Bitcoin organizations in Europe. If, for some reason, none of the funds raised are used I will return all bitcoins to the sender address (so make sure that you donate from an address that you control!)
Please send your donations to this Bitcoin address 1EyosiaYh9gVEP7VKPTyrFGSSoS8QDSsbb
About me My name is David Hedqvist and have been running bitcoin.se since early 2012. I am a moderator of the Scandinavian forum section at bitcointalk.org and I have also been a moderator at bitcoin.stackexchange.com since its launch.
I will post this message on bitcoin.se, on bitcointalk.org where my name is D.H. and on Reddit where my name is D_ H_. If you read about the case on curia.europa.eu or in media you can confirm that the case is about David Hedqvist and bitcoin.se. Feel free to send me a PM or an e-mail to [email protected] if you have any questions.
You may also contact Dr. Thaer Sabri ([email protected]), Chief Executive of Electronic Money Association, to confirm the legitimacy of this fund raiser.
submitted by D_H_ to Bitcoin [link] [comments]

No VAT to pay on bitcoin exchange transactions, says top EU court

No VAT to pay on bitcoin exchange transactions, says top EU court submitted by HiroJa to DogeNews [link] [comments]

The European top court said in a ruling that puts virtual currencies on a more equal footing with traditional cash.

Value added tax -- a type of sales levy -- needn’t be applied because the business involves “the exchange of different means of payment,” the EU Court of Justice in Luxembourg ruled Thursday. The case was triggered by a dispute in Sweden, where David Hedqvist set up a service for the exchange of mainstream money for bitcoin and vice versa. “Transactions to exchange traditional currencies for units of the bitcoin virtual currency (and vice versa) constitute the supply of services” under the bloc’s law “since they consist of the exchange of different means of payment,” the court ruled. As such they are exempt from value-added taxes, it said. I think that we who are holding VirtaCoins are in a whole new and exciting ballgame. The value of VirtaCoin can only keep going up. What do you think. Please comment.
submitted by Bwealthy2 to VirtaCoin [link] [comments]

No VAT to pay on bitcoin exchange transactions, says top EU court

This is an automatic summary, original reduced by 61%.
Bitcoin exchanges do not have to levy value-added tax on the margins they make when exchanging bitcoins for conventional currencies, the European Union's highest court ruled Thursday.
Would-be bitcoin operator David Hedqvist and the Swedish tax authority, Skatteverket, had asked the administrative court whether Hedqvist would have to charge his clients VAT when exchanging bitcoins for Swedish kronor.
The Swedish court asked the CJEU to rule whether the exchanging of bitcoins for traditional currencies in return for a margin or commission constituted the sale of a service, and if so, whether that service benefited from one of the exceptions in Article 135(1) of the directive.
The exchange of bitcoins cannot be considered the sale of goods, the CJEU said, as bitcoins are not tangible property, having no purpose other than to be a means of payment.
The court said, it was obliged to consider the purpose of the directive, rather than the precise wording of national laws, since the directive's goal was to harmonise the treatment of goods and services for the purposes of VAT across the EU. Bitcoins are to be treated like money itself, because they can be directly exchanged, the court said.
As a result, the CJEU ruled Thursday, bitcoin exchanges based in the EU need not charge VAT on the margins they make or commissions they charge when swapping bitcoin for traditional currencies, making doing business in bitcoin that little bit cheaper.
Summary Source | FAQ | Theory | Feedback | Top five keywords: Bitcoin#1 currency#2 court#3 service#4 whether#5
Post found in /technology, /BitcoinAll, /DogeNews and /Technology_.
NOTICE: This thread is for discussing the submission topic only. Do not discuss the concept of the autotldr bot here.
submitted by autotldr to autotldr [link] [comments]

Crypto Cast Network - YouTube Midsommar special del 4 Perspective - YouTube

Bitcoin.se is an independant site about Bitcoin, cryptocurrency, blockchain technology and economics run by me, David Hedqvist, since 2012. Read more about me and the site on about bitcoin.se . If you need help, first check out the forum where I go under the name D.H. Regarding purchases of Bitcoin on bitcoin.se, contact [email protected] . In the case of Skatteverket v David Hedqvist (C-264/14), the CJEU was effectively asked to determine whether that VAT exemption extended to Bitcoin exchange activity even though it is not legal tender. On 22 October 2015, the CJEU answered this in the affirmative and held that the margin earned by the exchange on the difference between the The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled that the services of a Bitcoin exchange in exchanging Bitcoin for a traditional currency is exempt from VAT on the basis of the ‘currency’ exemption (Skatteverket v David Hedqvist Case C-264/14).VAT is imposed across the European Union Member States. (Nov. 5, 2015) On October 22, 2015, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) issued a preliminary ruling on the taxation of Bitcoins. (Case C-264/14, Skatteverket v.David Hedqvist, 2015, INFOCURIA – CASE-LAW OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE (Oct. 22, 2015) (ECJ Preliminary Ruling).). The ruling was in response to a 2014 request by the Swedish Högsta Förvaltningsdomstolen (Supreme Administrative Court 10 Mr Hedqvist wishes to provide, through a company, services consisting of the exchange of traditional currency for the ‘bitcoin’ virtual currency and vice versa. 11 According to the order for reference the ‘bitcoin’ virtual currency is used, principally, for payments made between private individuals via the internet and in certain

[index] [26678] [6575] [12566] [22401] [25432] [30263] [4993] [3402] [17011] [28517]

Crypto Cast Network - YouTube

A show focused on providing more detail and depth to recently published articles in the bitcoin and crypto space by interviewing their authors one on one. ... A discussion with David Hedqvist ... A discussion with David Hedqvist (@BitcoinSverige) about his article "Why Bitcoin shouldn’t be compared to companies or payment systems". -Article link: http... A show focused on providing more detail and depth to recently published articles in the bitcoin and crypto space by interviewing their authors one on one. ... A discussion with David Hedqvist ... Unsubscribe from Hedqvist ́s Recept? Cancel Unsubscribe. Working... Subscribe Subscribed Unsubscribe 21. ... Banking on Bitcoin YouTube Movies. 2017 · Documentary; 1:23:41. David Hedqvist is the founder of Bitcoin.se and has also recently launches a new project called Covid19insweden.com which gives updates on the current situation with COVID-19 in Sweden and the world.

Flag Counter